Revista Organizações em Contexto (ROC) - Diretoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação - Universidade Metodista de São Paulo - UMESP.
ISSN Versão Eletrônica 1982-8756
ISSN Versão Impressa 1809-1040 (2005-2008)
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
How Much You Need To Expect You'll Pay For A Good Lawyer in Chandigarh
por Sara Plummer (21-10-2018)
It follows, therefore, that no industry can have the right Advocates to exist if it cannot be maintained except by bringing the wages below that level. 30,000 (Rupees thirty thousand) is in law justified for Excess Profits Tax and Business Profits Tax purposes? We are unable to see how s. 30,000 (Rupees thirty thousand) from out of the sum of Rs. Chatterjee is that the facts set out in s. discussed the scope of section 197(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and after observing that the decisions on that section were not uniform, proceeded to group them under three categories-those which had held that sanction was necessary when the act complained of attached to' the official character of the person doing it, those which had held that it was necessary in all cases in which the official character of the person gave him an opportunity for the commission of the crime, and those which had held it necessary when the offence was committed while the accused was actually engaged in the performance of official duties.
By the act of applying for execution the decree-holder quite clearly desires that the judgment-debtor should be stripped of all his right, title and interest in the property attached and sold and the order of the Court has the effect of so denuding the judgment-debtor and of passing his right, title and interest to the purchaser of the property at the Court sale. Here the act of the decree-holder in seeking execution by attachment and sale and the act of the Court in directing attachment and sale cannot possibly be said to be the happening of an event unconnected with the act of making a transfer such as death or devolution or succession referred to in Abedoonissa's case (supra) could be said to be.
4(2) on which the presumption of guilt is raised have no reasonable relation to the offences themselves, that for example, possession of liquor can be no evidence of possession of materials or apparatus for manufacture of liquor under s. 4(2) offends the requirement as to equality before law or the equal protection of laws. There is one more point which may be mentioned before we part with this case. Section 15-HA of the Act which deals with penalty for fraudulent and unfair trade practices and Section 15J which lay down the factors to be taken into account while adjudging the quantum of penalty reads as follows : This transfer 'of property is not by any assignment in writing executed by the transferor in favour of the transferee but is brought about by the operation of the statutory-provisions relating to and governing execution of decrees.
Thus this Privy Council decision itself shows that transfers "by operation of law" were not intended by it to be confined to the three cases of death, devolution or succession. He relied in support of this contention on the following observations of Holmes J. Advocates Although there can be no rigid and inexorable convention that a wage structure once fixed can never be changed to the prejudice of the workmen, there are well-recognised principles on which such revision must be founded, one important principle, to which there can be no exception, is that the wages of workmen cannot be allowed to fall below the bare subsistence level.
14 of the Constitution, and that the section must accordingly be declared to have become void under Art. 4(1) (a) and (j), and that therefore the impugned provision must be struck down as denying equal protection. 1306 In the course of his judgment, Varadachariar, J. 61,000 (Rupees sixtyone thousand) (for Income-tax and Excess Profits Tax and Business Profits Tax purposes) representing the value of high denomination notes which were encashed on the eighteenth day of January one thousand nine hundred and forty six, and (2) Whether in any event by reason of the orders of the Revenue Authorities not having found *at the alleged item Advocates was from alleged undisclosed business profits the assessment of Rs.
The High Court answered the first question in the affirmative but refused to answer the second question, being of the opinion that even though it had asked the Tribunal to refer that question under section 66 (2) of the Act, it had no jurisdiction to do so inasmuch as the appellants had not asked the Tribunal to refer 629 the second question and, therefore, no question arose of the Tribunal refusing to raise that question or to submit it for the decision of the High Court. (1) Whether there is any material to justify the assessment of Rs.
Sen incidentally argued that the result Advocates of the award passed by the Labour Appellate Tribunal is that there will be two scales of wage structure, one for those who are already in the employment of the appellant and the other for the new entrants.